Tma the mountain astrologer

The list mainly covers astrologers who played an important role in the astrological tradition over the past 3, years, and it …. This was the very first time that the three …. Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit Email. Traditional Astrology Debate I recently participated in a debate on the topic of modern versus traditional astrology, with astrologer Eric Meyers representing the modern approach, while I represented the traditional approach.

  1. pisces love horoscope december 6 2019.
  2. december 23 to december 23 horoscope.
  3. The Light of Venus TMA Review - Soulsign.
  4. Featured titles?
  5. Sign Up for Wade’s Newsletter.
  6. Copyright:.

Online Astrology Courses. Random Posts refresh random posts. Latest Video Post. The History of Western Astrology. The Modern vs. Traditional Astrology Debate. In other words, you can look at a sidereal horoscope and then look up at the sky and see that the sidereal signs do match up pretty well to the constellations. I had already had some problems reconciling my experience of character traits and personality in the people I knew with what the tropical signs are supposed to be about. I was also profoundly impressed at the accuracy of sidereal solar and lunar returns, which timed and described what actually happened to people and how they felt about it better than any predictive technique I had tried.

I read voluminously—still do—and sought out people who knew more than I did and attended lectures by people with reputations, but mostly I did a lot of horoscopes. I did astrology all the time—clients, family, friends, coworkers, famous people—everybody became a learning experience.

Related products

My kids hated astrology because they felt like they were in competition with it for my attention. Q: What did you read? Fagan revived the sidereal zodiac in the West in the 20th century and his work made eminently good sense to me. The references I followed up from these books got me into the habit of regularly studying academic journals.

I was guided by the bibliographies, references and notes in the books I read. Those things led to the inescapable conclusion that the sidereal signs based on the constellations were invested with meaning in the ancient world long before the tropical zodiac showed up.

Dancing on the Brink of the World reviewed in The Mountain Astrologer

It became clear that the authority of the sidereal signs had been usurped in the Greco Roman world by advocates of the tropical signs, whether by mistake or by design is not clear. Q: You mention Fagan first. I know he is considered the father of modern western sidereal astrology. Can you say more about him? He was born in Dublin, Ireland in and died in Tucson, Arizona in , a few months before I took up astrology. Cyril Fagan was hands-down one of very few astrologers of the first rank in the past hundred years.

He took up astrology in as a tropicalist, naturally, since, in the West, that was the only game in town. His vocation was British civil servant but his true calling was astrologer-extraordinary. He was an avid student of the material that had been dug up in the Near and Middle East in the first half of the 19th century and translated and published in the second half.

In , after many years of private study, Fagan was forced by the evidence to conclude that astrology was originally sidereal in the ancient world until the Greeks decided to use the equinoxes and solstices to reckon celestial positions, probably around the time of Hipparchus of Rhodes.

The Greek calendar was reckoned from the summer solstice, which probably served as a ready-made precedent in astronomical matters. Fagan wrote a monthly column beginning in in American Astrology Magazine that did more to put western sidereal astrology on the map than his books.

The column ran until his death and then appeared for several years afterward in reprint form in the magazine. His main point was that trait characteristics emanate from the sidereal signs, not the tropical signs.


This matter is at the heart of the disagreement between tropicalists and siderealists. Some, but very few tropicalists have maintained that both positions could be true, but most tropicalists and all the western siderealists I know will have none of that argument. Both camps have entrenched positions and there is no resolution in sight.

Actually the protagonists used to be more strident than they are now because there are no editors left who will let the tropicalists and siderealists insult each other in print laughs. The siderealists are definitely in the minority in the West but there has been since , with the publication of Zodiacs Old and New , a modest but continuous flow of defectors from the tropical ranks to the sidereal position. Almost nobody in the West begins their astrological studies as a siderealist. Becoming a siderealist is an act of apostasy laughs. Q: How does Hipparchus of Rhodes enter the picture?

Hipparchus was the greatest of the Greek astronomers of Classical Antiquity.

The Transforming Tradition

Precession is the mechanism that produces the division between tropical and sidereal. Hipparchus was convinced of the immobility of the earth. Hipparchus apparently thought the whole sky was moving as a unit.

Consider, for example, that Antares, the brightest star in Scorpio had a proper motion in the 20th century of a little more than 2 seconds of arc. At that rate it would take nearly , years for Antares to move one degree from the vantage point of the earth. Aldebaran, the defining star in the sidereal zodiac had a proper motion in the 20th century of about 4 seconds of arc.

  1. free daily horoscope for taurus.
  2. deccan herald weekly horoscope pisces.
  3. sun sign pisces compatibility!
  4. horoscope for gemini december 1 2019.
  5. Article Published in The Mountain Astrologer.
  6. 19 february 2020 taurus horoscope.

At that rate it will take centuries, which is 90, years, for Aldebaran to move one degree. In any case, the proper motion of individual stars is irrelevant because the formal definition of the sidereal zodiac excludes proper motion completely. The beginning of the sidereal zodiac was the point forty-five degrees west of Aldebaran, the brightest star in Taurus, for the epoch It corresponds very closely to the ancient Babylonian zero poin t.

Some people have said, incidentally, that the Babylonians were aware of precession, but as far as I know, there is no evidence for that assertion. You have to be aware of the true geometry of the solar system to understand that and also to reckon positions from equinox to equinox. The equinox is a moving point in relation to the zodiac, and right down to the Roman Imperial period, the equinox was defined in terms of the sidereal signs, not the other way around. They were clearly speaking of the sidereal signs because the tropical zodiac by definition begins with zero Aries.

Q: Did the Babylonians know about the equinoxes and solstices? Of course. The Babylonians took note of the vernal equinox for three non-astrological reasons but it was always computed and not observed. First, the Tigris and Euphrates rivers overflowed their banks in March during the first millennium B. Babylonia and Assyria are in a desert and near desert climate where you could only count on about millimeters of annual rainfall. It takes millimeters of annual rainfall to bring in a barley crop—the staple in the area because it requires less water than wheat—so it was essential for the Babylonians to capture as much of the spring flood as they could in dikes, canals and catch basins to supplement the often inadequate rainfall.

If the canals were damaged and not repaired, the area immediately returned to desert. Second, the New Moon nearest the equinox, on either side of it, not the equinox itself, was the beginning of their civil year; they added an additional month every three years to keep their lunar calendar in sync with the solar year. The day of the equinox when day and night are equal was the zero point for that measure. But the Babylonians and Assyrians, and the people who were influenced by them until the Greeks, were rigidly connected to the stars with respect to the measure of celestial longitude.

Of course yours is always the first one I read when my copy of TMA arrives. I resonate with your voice and am deeply inspired by your wisdom and humble practicality. Thank you. Or what if we do, but cruel fate prevents us from uniting? Astrology Readings With Dana I believe in life, in the archetypes, and the capacity of people to write better and better stories for themselves. Hoping to read charts with greater insight and accuracy?

Magamall | Magazine Newsstand - Mountain Astrologer

Desiring a boost in confidence? May they do the same for you! Books We Love Looking for a good read? Mooncircles authors share a few of the great books on their shelves.